Read a post in VentureBeat about how VC's are upset about the fees that major i-banks like Goldman Sachs charge small companies for IPO'ing. They feel that the larger banks have traditionally demanded large fees (e.g. $7M in a $100M IPO), while smaller banks in the syndicate that do most of the work get a much smaller piece of the fees. Reminds me of the research I saw last fall about how IPO's from the large investment banks (based on the league tables) actually perform worse than those from smaller investment banks.
Read an interesting article a couple weeks back in the WSJ on how biofuels may actually increase carbon emissions in the medium to long-term. Apprently the shifts in land-use necessary to support the production of bio-materials like soybeans, corn, or palm could in fact release more carbon emissions. The time it takes to get carbon-neutral on some of these projects is pretty crazy - 319 years for soybean biodiesel from Brazil (assuming you're clearing rainforest), 93 years for corn ethanol from the U.S. (assuming you're clearing grasslands), 86 years for palm biodiesel from Indonesia (assuming you're clearing rainforest). I suppose biofuels really aren't meant to reduce carbon emissions, but just crazy that they potentially exacerbate the problem so much.
Comments