Greylock: An Adventure Capital Story

I just finished reading a book I checked out from the Ford Library at Fuqua titled Greylock: An Adventure Capital Story. Written by William Elfers, the founder of Greylock Partners, the book chronicles the founding of Greylock and ensuing growth from 1964 to 1995 when the book was published. The book's out of print and when released was privately published by Greylock, so I feel lucky to have gotten my hands on a copy.

Elfers goes into detail around how he raised the first fund, how he recruited the original general partners, and then he and other general partners provide accounts of individual investments. One of things that really stood out to me about the book was the emphasis that Elfers put on his description of people - past colleagues from ARD, Greylock's limited partners, general partners, associates, entrepreneurs they invested in, CEO's they brought in to run their portfolio companies, investment bankers they worked with, other venture capital firms they repeatedly co-invested with (most notably Sutter Hill), etc. The personal relationships, connections, team, and general ecosystem that Elfers built appears to by far be the major achievement that drove Greylock's success.

Elfers also ends the book with a chapter titled "Reflections". Included in that chapter is a list of the Ten Venture Investment Guidelines that he presented "in a speech at the tenth anniversary celebration of the Palmer venture organization":

Set aside the mystery. Success in venture capital is essentially homework and hard work.
The unexpected is usually unfavorable.
Technical experts are often right about the technology and wrong about the technology's business consideration.
There is nothing wrong with cash, if you get enough of it.
Watch out when your founder-president becomes too interested in his first Mercedes, joins the Young President's Association, takes dancing lessons, or begins making speeches at Harvard Business School.
Beware of investment bankers bearing gifts!
Do a lot of "little things" right; they add up.
If you build companies well, the financial results take care of themselves, sooner or later.
You can't live off paper or unrealized gains.
As in most human or commercial affairs, reputation is everything.

Great book and worth a read if you can get your hands on it.

Comments

Biofuels May Hinder Anitglobal-Warming Efforts

Read an interesting article a couple weeks back in the WSJ on how biofuels may actually increase carbon emissions in the medium to long-term. Apprently the shifts in land-use necessary to support the production of bio-materials like soybeans, corn, or palm could in fact release more carbon emissions. The time it takes to get carbon-neutral on some of these projects is pretty crazy - 319 years for soybean biodiesel from Brazil (assuming you're clearing rainforest), 93 years for corn ethanol from the U.S. (assuming you're clearing grasslands), 86 years for palm biodiesel from Indonesia (assuming you're clearing rainforest). I suppose biofuels really aren't meant to reduce carbon emissions, but just crazy that they potentially exacerbate the problem so much.

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an

Bloomberg for President?

We can only hope. I read an article in the WSJ about how business people across the country, from entrepreneurs to bankers, are all hoping for Bloomberg to run. The economy thus far seems to have taken an unusual backseat in this years election but seems to be emerging as an important issue. An interesting excerpt: As the economy has emerged as a dominant issue in the 2008 campaign, candidates have struck populist notes, from Republican Mike Huckabee's boast that he is not a "wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street" to Democrat Barack Obama's visit to Wall Street to chastise finance executives for failing to protect the middle class. I can see the approach these guys are taking and I'm sure they have really smart campaign strategists. But I really wonder if this type of message of polarizing the "working man" vs. "big business" really resonates with voters anymore? Is the middle-class really that disgruntled with big business and income dispa

Power Pal

Search This Blog