Future Vision of Displays, Networking, and Interfaces

There are a few articles and blog posts I read recently that highlight some exciting emerging technologies for the future of electronic displays, networking, and interfaces. One I saw a few months back was Microsoft's 2019 vision video (scroll down for the long version). It's a 5 min video that runs through not only advances in physical devices and materials, but also associated networking and interfaces. Another one was Nokia's Morph concept. It's their take on the impact that nanotechnology can have on devices.

It looks pretty science fiction-like when you watch the videos, but it's closer to reality than you would think. The obvious one that's already a reality in the Microsoft video is the Surface technology. I just came across the flexible OLED display technology that Sony is working on. Awesome to see a working prototype. Another one is a company called Plastic Logic who have built display technologies where transistors are placed on plastic rather than silicon. The immediate application would be for book readers (like the Kindle). Another technology is MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical systems) and Pico projectors. You combine lasers with a tiny oscillating mirror (using MEMS technology) and you get very bright and power efficient display projection in tiny devices. Here's a short, cool animation of how pico projectors works and a news clip (from a year ago). Pico projectors embedded in phones should be on the market next year.

The ubiquity and integration into everyday life that these devices and technologies allows will open up tons of opportunities. Very cool stuff.

Comments

The Fortunate 400

So there's rich, and then there's super rich. I recently read an article in the WSJ about the top 400 taxpayers based on income. Pretty incredible statistics. Those top 400, or what they call the "Fortunate 400", pulled in $85.6 billion in income in 2005. That's over $200 million each ... in one year! Here's a quick graphic to drive that home: Very impressive. There's all the obvious jaw-dropping statistics to go with that. For instance, to make the cut to be in the 400 you had to pull in at least $100 million. With an average of $200 million, that means there's people pulling in well over that number. Obviously, quite crazy numbers, and generally speaking not necessarily anything to be concerned about. I'm all for capitalism. But one of the more disheartening statistics was that adjusting for inflation, the minimum income to make the cutoff into the Fortunate 400 has nearly tripled since 1992. That's probably not a good sign as I imagine that...

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an...

A Possible Solution to the Mortgage Crisis

Came across this one on Mankiw's blog as well (... someone has been stealing my WSJ's each morning before I can pick them up outside). Martin Feldstein, a professor at Harvard and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors for Reagan, had an opinion article in the WSJ yesterday that outlined a possible solution to the mortgage crisis. Criteria for the plan is: don't shift burden to taxpayers, don't force banks to eat all the losses, and create an incentive for homeowners to stay in their homes. The idea is that the US government would provide loans to homeowners up to 20% of their mortgage amount, with a 15 year pay-back period and adjustable interest rate based on the two-year treasury note. The whole thing would be funded by selling more two-year treasury notes. This would obviously not stop anyone from walking away from their home if they have negative equity, but it might prompt those that are worried about that scenario happening to them in the future to sti...

Power Pal

Search This Blog