Skip to main content

Recapturing Waste Heat and Reviving Nuclear Power

As a Cal lifetime alum, I get a free subscription to Forefront, a quarterly publication the College of Engineering puts out. The Fall issues cover was titled "Green Future". There were a few really cool ideas in there that researchers in the engineering department are pushing forward. There were two that I wanted to comment on.

The first was a project to recapture waste heat by creating nano-scale devices that convert heat to elecricity. The premise is to use the "Seebeck Effect" (thermoelectric effect) in cheap organic materials to produce electricity from all of the wasted heat that's created in burning fossil fuels. Apparently, for every 1 watt of power, you waste 1.5 watts of energy in waste heat. That's a ridiculous amount of waste. The world's power output is somewhere in the 10 trillion watt range, so that means there's 15 trillion watts being wasted. If you could recapture even a small fraction of that with these types of thermoelectric devices, you could reduce green-house gas emissions considerably. There were also some really interesting ideas for how this could be used for the developing world as well - "A thermoelectric sheet wrapped around a cooking stove, for example, could generate 10 watts of power, enough to keep a reading lamp burning all evening." Very very cool.

The other project was to revive the nuclear power industry by creating reactors that are safer and more efficient in handling waste. It always seemed so sad to me that we still use coal as one of our primary fuel sources when nuclear fission is so clean. Why are Americans so afraid of nuclear power? European nations have actively embraced it and are benefiting from that. In France, 77 percent of their power is derived from nuclear. That compares to only 20 percent here in the U.S. The problems have been safety (post-Three Mile Island) and waste. Researchers are working on a self-contained reactor that would help solve both those problems. The fissile material is safely locked away in the reactor - so you don't have to worry about either meltdowns or with someone stealing the material to make a bomb. Hopefully the U.S. will get nuclear back on the agenda as we're evaluating options for energy independence.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fortunate 400

So there's rich, and then there's super rich. I recently read an article in the WSJ about the top 400 taxpayers based on income. Pretty incredible statistics. Those top 400, or what they call the "Fortunate 400", pulled in $85.6 billion in income in 2005. That's over $200 million each ... in one year! Here's a quick graphic to drive that home: Very impressive. There's all the obvious jaw-dropping statistics to go with that. For instance, to make the cut to be in the 400 you had to pull in at least $100 million. With an average of $200 million, that means there's people pulling in well over that number. Obviously, quite crazy numbers, and generally speaking not necessarily anything to be concerned about. I'm all for capitalism. But one of the more disheartening statistics was that adjusting for inflation, the minimum income to make the cutoff into the Fortunate 400 has nearly tripled since 1992. That's probably not a good sign as I imagine that...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an...
3 comments
Read more

A Possible Solution to the Mortgage Crisis

Came across this one on Mankiw's blog as well (... someone has been stealing my WSJ's each morning before I can pick them up outside). Martin Feldstein, a professor at Harvard and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors for Reagan, had an opinion article in the WSJ yesterday that outlined a possible solution to the mortgage crisis. Criteria for the plan is: don't shift burden to taxpayers, don't force banks to eat all the losses, and create an incentive for homeowners to stay in their homes. The idea is that the US government would provide loans to homeowners up to 20% of their mortgage amount, with a 15 year pay-back period and adjustable interest rate based on the two-year treasury note. The whole thing would be funded by selling more two-year treasury notes. This would obviously not stop anyone from walking away from their home if they have negative equity, but it might prompt those that are worried about that scenario happening to them in the future to sti...
Post a Comment
Read more