Skip to main content

No End In Sight

I watched an absolutely horrifying documentary on-demand on Netflix called No End In Sight. I highly recommend it. It covers the Iraq war, primarily the aftermath of the war - in particular focusing on the lack of planning, poor decision making, and arrogance of the Bush administration. The beginning parts of the movie make clear the lack of post-war planning that was in place when the war started and even when the war ended. There were literally no plans. That part of the movie is obviously disturbing. But the majority of the movie is actually focused in on three policies put into place by Paul Bremer under the Coalition Provisional Authority. Those were:
  1. Not declaring martial law and not providing enough troops to maintain order
  2. De-Ba'athification
  3. Disbanding the Iraqi Army

The repurcussions of the first one are pretty obvious. There's no police, there's no army, and Saddam Hussein released thousands of criminals before the war started. What do you expect to happen? Looting, violonce, vandalism, etc. And then with the second and third, I suppose if you're a political hardliner, some of these decisions may have made sense. For instance, the Ba'athist were the political party in power under Saddam Hussein. How could you possibly trust any of them in the new administration? Aren't they all totally corrupt? I suppose you could say the same thing about the Iraqi Army. How could you trust them? Why not just completely disenfrancise them? Maybe that will work. Well, that's what they did. The problem with the "De-Ba'athification" was that the only people in the country that were trained to run a government were immediately told that they could never work for the government ever again. These are all the intellectuals and even the school teachers. How do you run a government without these people - most of which were apolitical and had only joined the Ba'ath party to continue their careers? The problem with disenfranchising hundreds of thousands of Iraqi soldiers (like 500,000) was two-fold. The first is that there was suddenly no military - i.e. no one to protect Iraq's border, to protect it's infrastructure, to maintain peace and order. The second is that suddenly you have half a million out of work men who have no way of feeding their families. What do they do? The only job in town is to join the insurgency, so why not do that?

Overall, just a frightening frightening summary of post-war Iraq. But what's most disturbing is the amazing arrogance of the Bush administration and how they didn't listen to any of the advice provided to them by the military or intelligence communities. Equally sad as it is infuriating.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biofuels May Hinder Anitglobal-Warming Efforts

Read an interesting article a couple weeks back in the WSJ on how biofuels may actually increase carbon emissions in the medium to long-term. Apprently the shifts in land-use necessary to support the production of bio-materials like soybeans, corn, or palm could in fact release more carbon emissions. The time it takes to get carbon-neutral on some of these projects is pretty crazy - 319 years for soybean biodiesel from Brazil (assuming you're clearing rainforest), 93 years for corn ethanol from the U.S. (assuming you're clearing grasslands), 86 years for palm biodiesel from Indonesia (assuming you're clearing rainforest). I suppose biofuels really aren't meant to reduce carbon emissions, but just crazy that they potentially exacerbate the problem so much.
3 comments
Read more

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an
3 comments
Read more

Bloomberg for President?

We can only hope. I read an article in the WSJ about how business people across the country, from entrepreneurs to bankers, are all hoping for Bloomberg to run. The economy thus far seems to have taken an unusual backseat in this years election but seems to be emerging as an important issue. An interesting excerpt: As the economy has emerged as a dominant issue in the 2008 campaign, candidates have struck populist notes, from Republican Mike Huckabee's boast that he is not a "wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street" to Democrat Barack Obama's visit to Wall Street to chastise finance executives for failing to protect the middle class. I can see the approach these guys are taking and I'm sure they have really smart campaign strategists. But I really wonder if this type of message of polarizing the "working man" vs. "big business" really resonates with voters anymore? Is the middle-class really that disgruntled with big business and income dispa
2 comments
Read more