Skip to main content

Outsourcing Medical Care

I've read some articles lately about medical tourism and came across one today from BusinessWeek called "Outsourcing the Patients". It talks about a really interesting trend of health insurers sending their policyholders overseas to get health care because the costs are so much cheaper. And we're not talking about some obscure insurers, the article refers to Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina for its example. These insurers are really concerned about rising health care costs in the U.S. It's what sent WellPoint's stock tumbling almost 30% this past week - an amazing loss in market value - because they had to make "revisions to our prior earnings guidance due to higher than expected medical costs". One of the biggest Blue affiliates with over 250 actuaries underestimating costs definitely spooks the market and speaks to how high costs really are.

To put how high costs are in perspective, here's a summary from the BusinessWeek article comparing health care costs across countries:
ProcedureU.S.SingaporeThailandIndia
Heart Bypass$130,000$18,500$11,000$10,000
Heart Valve Replacement160,00012,50010,0009,000
Angioplasty57,00013,00013,00011,000
Hip Replacement43,00012,00012,0009,000
Hysterectomy20,0006,0004,5003,000
Knee Replacement40,00013,00010,0008,500
Spinal Fusion62,0009,0007,0005,500


And just to be sure that we're comparing apples to apples, all of the above costs are from hospitals that have been accredited by the same agency that is well regarded in the medical community. The major difference is that in Asia it's difficult to pursue malpractice lawsuits. Either way, the above data set raises a few questions for me. 1) How can these foreign countries offer the same procedure at presumably the same quality for so much lower a price? (Can it really be related to providers not getting paid for all services and jacking up prices as a result? Or to cover themselves from malpractice lawsuits?). And then 2) What are you going to say to your health insurer when they ask you to fly to Thailand for that next operation?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Fortunate 400

So there's rich, and then there's super rich. I recently read an article in the WSJ about the top 400 taxpayers based on income. Pretty incredible statistics. Those top 400, or what they call the "Fortunate 400", pulled in $85.6 billion in income in 2005. That's over $200 million each ... in one year! Here's a quick graphic to drive that home: Very impressive. There's all the obvious jaw-dropping statistics to go with that. For instance, to make the cut to be in the 400 you had to pull in at least $100 million. With an average of $200 million, that means there's people pulling in well over that number. Obviously, quite crazy numbers, and generally speaking not necessarily anything to be concerned about. I'm all for capitalism. But one of the more disheartening statistics was that adjusting for inflation, the minimum income to make the cutoff into the Fortunate 400 has nearly tripled since 1992. That's probably not a good sign as I imagine that...

Dancing on the Edge of a Volcano

I found this opinion piece ( Democrats aren't innocent bystanders ) interesting on how both Democrats and Republicans share responsibility for polarizing the electorate and undermining some of its faith in democracy. It references two other posts that were pretty good as well: The Disease of Delegitimization The Weimarization of the American Republic The second article is really long and heavy on history.  But given all of the comparisons people make between the current times and those of post-WWI Germany, I found it interesting to dive in to understand where the comparisons are coming from and how close we really are.  The short answer is that we aren't that close (phew). Seems like post-WWI Germany was incredibly fragile.  This was a good excerpt that summarized it: So, unlike the 60s, you have a dynamic in which both sides are behaving like radicals, in which the establishment isn’t yelling “stop,” and in which oikophobia is more evenly distributed, relative to its Boo...

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an...