Skip to main content

Outsourcing Medical Care

I've read some articles lately about medical tourism and came across one today from BusinessWeek called "Outsourcing the Patients". It talks about a really interesting trend of health insurers sending their policyholders overseas to get health care because the costs are so much cheaper. And we're not talking about some obscure insurers, the article refers to Blue Cross Blue Shield of South Carolina for its example. These insurers are really concerned about rising health care costs in the U.S. It's what sent WellPoint's stock tumbling almost 30% this past week - an amazing loss in market value - because they had to make "revisions to our prior earnings guidance due to higher than expected medical costs". One of the biggest Blue affiliates with over 250 actuaries underestimating costs definitely spooks the market and speaks to how high costs really are.

To put how high costs are in perspective, here's a summary from the BusinessWeek article comparing health care costs across countries:
ProcedureU.S.SingaporeThailandIndia
Heart Bypass$130,000$18,500$11,000$10,000
Heart Valve Replacement160,00012,50010,0009,000
Angioplasty57,00013,00013,00011,000
Hip Replacement43,00012,00012,0009,000
Hysterectomy20,0006,0004,5003,000
Knee Replacement40,00013,00010,0008,500
Spinal Fusion62,0009,0007,0005,500


And just to be sure that we're comparing apples to apples, all of the above costs are from hospitals that have been accredited by the same agency that is well regarded in the medical community. The major difference is that in Asia it's difficult to pursue malpractice lawsuits. Either way, the above data set raises a few questions for me. 1) How can these foreign countries offer the same procedure at presumably the same quality for so much lower a price? (Can it really be related to providers not getting paid for all services and jacking up prices as a result? Or to cover themselves from malpractice lawsuits?). And then 2) What are you going to say to your health insurer when they ask you to fly to Thailand for that next operation?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Biofuels May Hinder Anitglobal-Warming Efforts

Read an interesting article a couple weeks back in the WSJ on how biofuels may actually increase carbon emissions in the medium to long-term. Apprently the shifts in land-use necessary to support the production of bio-materials like soybeans, corn, or palm could in fact release more carbon emissions. The time it takes to get carbon-neutral on some of these projects is pretty crazy - 319 years for soybean biodiesel from Brazil (assuming you're clearing rainforest), 93 years for corn ethanol from the U.S. (assuming you're clearing grasslands), 86 years for palm biodiesel from Indonesia (assuming you're clearing rainforest). I suppose biofuels really aren't meant to reduce carbon emissions, but just crazy that they potentially exacerbate the problem so much.

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an

Bloomberg for President?

We can only hope. I read an article in the WSJ about how business people across the country, from entrepreneurs to bankers, are all hoping for Bloomberg to run. The economy thus far seems to have taken an unusual backseat in this years election but seems to be emerging as an important issue. An interesting excerpt: As the economy has emerged as a dominant issue in the 2008 campaign, candidates have struck populist notes, from Republican Mike Huckabee's boast that he is not a "wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street" to Democrat Barack Obama's visit to Wall Street to chastise finance executives for failing to protect the middle class. I can see the approach these guys are taking and I'm sure they have really smart campaign strategists. But I really wonder if this type of message of polarizing the "working man" vs. "big business" really resonates with voters anymore? Is the middle-class really that disgruntled with big business and income dispa