Ireland and Corporate Taxes

While I was over in Italy there was quite a bit of coverage of the EU referendum in Ireland. On the flight back I read an interesting article in the Financial Times. Ireland had not yet voted on the measure at the time of the article and they subsequently voted No. There was a tremendous amount of campaigning and advertising around both the Yes and No sides. But what I found particularly interesting about the situation is that it was actually the left-wing (unions, etc.) that were pushing for the No vote. And one of the primary reasons they were pushing the No vote was because they claimed that Ireland must lose control of their ability to continue to have low corporate taxes.

Unions pushing for lower corporate taxes! Amazing, right? Ireland has corporate taxes hovering around 12.5% and their economy has benefited significantly as a result. Here's a quick excerpt from the article:

Ireland's corporate tax take was €6.4bn last year, representing a little less than half total tax revenues. Only Luxembourg of the EU 27 depends more on corporate taxes.

In Germany the contribution is about 5 per cent of total tax take, in France 6 per cent and in the UK 9 per cent.

Ireland, with it's 12.5%, pulls in half of it's tax revenue from corporations! Now, the No campaign was primarily just playing on people's fears regarding the actually referendum. There are several EU nations with rates as low or even lower than Ireland. But as an American, that's not what I picked up on. Looking back at one of my posts from a year ago - The Wrong Side of the Laffer Curve - you can see how far off the United States is compared to Ireland. It definitely seems like we're missing an opportunity here. Even Obama is considering lowering corporate tax rates.

Comments

Biofuels May Hinder Anitglobal-Warming Efforts

Read an interesting article a couple weeks back in the WSJ on how biofuels may actually increase carbon emissions in the medium to long-term. Apprently the shifts in land-use necessary to support the production of bio-materials like soybeans, corn, or palm could in fact release more carbon emissions. The time it takes to get carbon-neutral on some of these projects is pretty crazy - 319 years for soybean biodiesel from Brazil (assuming you're clearing rainforest), 93 years for corn ethanol from the U.S. (assuming you're clearing grasslands), 86 years for palm biodiesel from Indonesia (assuming you're clearing rainforest). I suppose biofuels really aren't meant to reduce carbon emissions, but just crazy that they potentially exacerbate the problem so much.

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an

Bloomberg for President?

We can only hope. I read an article in the WSJ about how business people across the country, from entrepreneurs to bankers, are all hoping for Bloomberg to run. The economy thus far seems to have taken an unusual backseat in this years election but seems to be emerging as an important issue. An interesting excerpt: As the economy has emerged as a dominant issue in the 2008 campaign, candidates have struck populist notes, from Republican Mike Huckabee's boast that he is not a "wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street" to Democrat Barack Obama's visit to Wall Street to chastise finance executives for failing to protect the middle class. I can see the approach these guys are taking and I'm sure they have really smart campaign strategists. But I really wonder if this type of message of polarizing the "working man" vs. "big business" really resonates with voters anymore? Is the middle-class really that disgruntled with big business and income dispa

Power Pal

Search This Blog