Skip to main content

Deepwater Wind

I read a few articles lately about energy created by wind turbines placed in offshore, deep water locations. One article was in Forbes called Deepwater Wind. The other article was in the WSJ called Winds Shift in Energy Debate. It doesn't seem like you can get much cleaner in terms of energy production than wind. But due to problems with the energy grid and transmission capacity, one of the problems with wind turbines is that they need to be close to the markets that will actually consume the energy. For a major city, one of the solutions that has been proposed is to place wind turbines just offshore. The conditions offshore offer consistent, steady wind. But the problem is that the wind turbines obstruct the ocean view.

An excerpt about this from the WSJ:

Because of favorable wind conditions and the relative ease of siting, much of the U.S. construction to date has been in areas far from big population centers. In many cases, transmission systems lack the capacity to move all of the resulting electricity to where it is most needed. "The power can't get to market," says Stow Walker, associate director of Cambridge Energy Research Associates, a consulting concern in Massachusetts.

Building offshore would allow developers to produce electricity closer to big cities, particularly along the East Coast. The downside is that it would also boost construction costs by 30% or more. Erecting turbines within view of pricey coastal real estate also increases the odds of a backlash since a typical utility-grade unit includes a tower nearly as tall as the Statue of Liberty and a rotor roughly as wide as a football field is long.

As a result, there are no offshore wind turbines anywhere in the United States. While Norway currently gets about 20% of its power from wind, we only get about 1.2%. According to the WSJ article, "A recent Energy Department report said wind power could supply 20% of the country's energy needs by 2030." So how do we get there? How do we tap this great potential energy source without disturbing the skyline?

One company in Norway is proposing to build wind turbines twice as far offshore as normal turbines - up to 20 miles out. That would solve the aesthetic issues that people have. But currently those turbines cost $20 million a piece to put up - that's about 4 or 5 times the cost of a near shore or onshore turbine. It'd be interesting to do the math on the return, but I imagine even at that cost it would still be cost-effective in the long-run.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Possible Solution to the Mortgage Crisis

Came across this one on Mankiw's blog as well (... someone has been stealing my WSJ's each morning before I can pick them up outside). Martin Feldstein, a professor at Harvard and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors for Reagan, had an opinion article in the WSJ yesterday that outlined a possible solution to the mortgage crisis. Criteria for the plan is: don't shift burden to taxpayers, don't force banks to eat all the losses, and create an incentive for homeowners to stay in their homes. The idea is that the US government would provide loans to homeowners up to 20% of their mortgage amount, with a 15 year pay-back period and adjustable interest rate based on the two-year treasury note. The whole thing would be funded by selling more two-year treasury notes. This would obviously not stop anyone from walking away from their home if they have negative equity, but it might prompt those that are worried about that scenario happening to them in the future to sti...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Reluctant Fundamentalist

I read The Reluctant Fundamentalist by Mohsin Hamid while on vacation in Italy and thought it was really good. The book basically tells the story of a Pakistani man who comes to the US, attends a good university, gets a dream job in financial services in New York, falls in love with an American girl, and then abandons it all to return to his home country after 9/11. Although the story is a little contrived - the parallel between the man's failing romance with the girl and his failing romance with America is a little too obvious - it's really wonderfully written and a real page-turner. Given my ethnic background, how I went to a good school, moved to New York to do consulting, and was there on 9/11, much of the story felt familiar. At its core, for me, it was really a story about identity in the U.S. Particularly about changing your identity here - the ability to transform from an immigrant or an outsider to one of the elite and how America post-9/11 developed an isolationi...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Fortunate 400

So there's rich, and then there's super rich. I recently read an article in the WSJ about the top 400 taxpayers based on income. Pretty incredible statistics. Those top 400, or what they call the "Fortunate 400", pulled in $85.6 billion in income in 2005. That's over $200 million each ... in one year! Here's a quick graphic to drive that home: Very impressive. There's all the obvious jaw-dropping statistics to go with that. For instance, to make the cut to be in the 400 you had to pull in at least $100 million. With an average of $200 million, that means there's people pulling in well over that number. Obviously, quite crazy numbers, and generally speaking not necessarily anything to be concerned about. I'm all for capitalism. But one of the more disheartening statistics was that adjusting for inflation, the minimum income to make the cutoff into the Fortunate 400 has nearly tripled since 1992. That's probably not a good sign as I imagine that...
Post a Comment
Read more