Skip to main content

Rise of Argentine Wine

I read an interesting article in USA Today a couple weeks ago while traveling. USA Today actually is pretty fun reading. Anyhow, the article was about the Argentine wine industry and how it has grown over the last 30 years or so. Sue and I have been trying out Malbec's from Argentina lately (including the Norton winery they mention in the article), so I thought it was interesting to read the background on the whole industry.

Apparently the wine industry was already pretty big in Argentina, but they generally only sold their wines locally. But a part-time UC Berkeley economics professor put the lesson from Napa Valley into action. Napa was able to elevate their wines to be competitive with those from Europe. He figured, why not do that in Argentina? So he did. And he made an interesting decision in pricing the wine that demanded people respect Argentina's product. Here's an excerpt:

By 1990, Catena had returned to Argentina and begun producing wines for sale abroad. As he tiptoed into the American market, however, he made a crucial decision. At the time, most wines from neighboring Chile were selling in the USA for less than $10. But Catena eschewed the low end of the market and offered his cabernet sauvignon for $15 and priced his chardonnay at $13. It was an audacious move for a winery in a country with no global profile.

"They distinguished themselves by not coming in at the rock bottom end of the market. They did not rely on cheap wine," says distributor Jim Faber, vice president of the San Francisco Wine Exchange.


Then there was an interesting excerpt about the Malbec grape.

Argentina's fortunes are tied to the unheralded malbec, a grape that originated in southwest France, where it was used for blending. The word may have originated with the French mal bouche, or bad mouth, an indication of the disdain with which Old World winemakers regarded the lowly grape, says Steindl.

Transplanted to Argentina, however, malbec thrived. In the mid-1990s, it began receiving its first notices as an alternative to traditional reds such as cabernet sauvignon. But sales to the USA remained tiny. It took a financial crisis that plunged much of Argentina into poverty to give the industry its big chance.

There are actually multiple reasons after that point why the industry was really able to take-off. Here are some of the top reasons:
  • Argentine economic crisis: Because the currency plunged in value, sales abroad (in the U.S. for example) were worth multiples locally while the wineries were able to continue paying their workers in pesos. They had huge jumps in profit margins up to 70%.
  • Rising shipping costs: Because of higher oil prices and scarce cargo ships due to demand from India and China, the U.S. looked closer to source their wine.
  • Cheap land in Argentina: Because of the economic crisis, land prices also plunged. That meant a lot of investment by established wine producers like Kendall Jackson.
It's pretty interesting to see how a whole industry can be born like that.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an

Biofuels May Hinder Anitglobal-Warming Efforts

Read an interesting article a couple weeks back in the WSJ on how biofuels may actually increase carbon emissions in the medium to long-term. Apprently the shifts in land-use necessary to support the production of bio-materials like soybeans, corn, or palm could in fact release more carbon emissions. The time it takes to get carbon-neutral on some of these projects is pretty crazy - 319 years for soybean biodiesel from Brazil (assuming you're clearing rainforest), 93 years for corn ethanol from the U.S. (assuming you're clearing grasslands), 86 years for palm biodiesel from Indonesia (assuming you're clearing rainforest). I suppose biofuels really aren't meant to reduce carbon emissions, but just crazy that they potentially exacerbate the problem so much.

Bloomberg for President?

We can only hope. I read an article in the WSJ about how business people across the country, from entrepreneurs to bankers, are all hoping for Bloomberg to run. The economy thus far seems to have taken an unusual backseat in this years election but seems to be emerging as an important issue. An interesting excerpt: As the economy has emerged as a dominant issue in the 2008 campaign, candidates have struck populist notes, from Republican Mike Huckabee's boast that he is not a "wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street" to Democrat Barack Obama's visit to Wall Street to chastise finance executives for failing to protect the middle class. I can see the approach these guys are taking and I'm sure they have really smart campaign strategists. But I really wonder if this type of message of polarizing the "working man" vs. "big business" really resonates with voters anymore? Is the middle-class really that disgruntled with big business and income dispa