Skip to main content

Life, Liberty, and (above all) Property

I read an article in HBS Working Knowledge titled "How Property Ownership Changes Your World View". It's about an economic study conducted in Argentina that showed how owning property changes your view of the world. They found an area in Argentina where 1,800 landless families occupied an area of land that was owned by someone else (i.e. they were squatters). After the change in government in 1984, the state proposed to pay off the original owners and grant the squatters ownership of the land (subject to litigation by the owners to adjust the price). By 1998, 62 percent of the squatters owned land the other 38 percent did not. They conducted a survey of each group to see if the families would have different views.

The results were pretty telling:
Di Tella and his coauthors found that squatters with land titles believed individual achievement is possible by a margin of 31 percent over those who did not hold title to their land; the margin for those with the materialist view that money is important to be happy was 34 percent; and 17 percent more squatters with titles believed that other people could be trusted. The only question that did not show a significant difference related to the meritocratic belief that effort pays off—in this case, the majority of both groups believe that this is true.
There are several implications for the developing world in terms of their willingness to accept capitalism.
The author of the study made this point:
If people don't own property, they don't believe that they can build on their success.
That seems pretty straightforward, but it seems really difficult for many developing countries to deal with. Particularly the legal aspects of ensuring property rights is a major problem. In the documentary Commanding Heights, they include a sequence on Hernando De Soto, an economist that explored this topic. He wrote a book on it called The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else.

The idea of property ownership (and the pursuit of property) is so embedded in the culture in the West, it's easy to take for granted. Everyone is familiar with the phrase "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" from the Declaration of Independence. But that was actually a derivation from John Locke ("life, liberty, and estate (or property)") and Adam Smith ("life, liberty, and the pursuit of property"). And in fact, the Declaration of Colonial Rights made by the First Continental Congress used the phrase "life, liberty and property".

For those countries where property rights (and the ability for the common man to realistically own property) are weak or non-existent and are not ingrained in the culture as they are in the West (or where decades of Socialism or Communism have made people believe that private property is bad), it's going to be very difficult to make capitalism stick. The interesting thing about this study in Argentina is that if people are granted property and their right to it is protected under law, their view of the world does change.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an...
3 comments
Read more

Dancing on the Edge of a Volcano

I found this opinion piece ( Democrats aren't innocent bystanders ) interesting on how both Democrats and Republicans share responsibility for polarizing the electorate and undermining some of its faith in democracy. It references two other posts that were pretty good as well: The Disease of Delegitimization The Weimarization of the American Republic The second article is really long and heavy on history.  But given all of the comparisons people make between the current times and those of post-WWI Germany, I found it interesting to dive in to understand where the comparisons are coming from and how close we really are.  The short answer is that we aren't that close (phew). Seems like post-WWI Germany was incredibly fragile.  This was a good excerpt that summarized it: So, unlike the 60s, you have a dynamic in which both sides are behaving like radicals, in which the establishment isn’t yelling “stop,” and in which oikophobia is more evenly distributed, relative to its Boo...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Fortunate 400

So there's rich, and then there's super rich. I recently read an article in the WSJ about the top 400 taxpayers based on income. Pretty incredible statistics. Those top 400, or what they call the "Fortunate 400", pulled in $85.6 billion in income in 2005. That's over $200 million each ... in one year! Here's a quick graphic to drive that home: Very impressive. There's all the obvious jaw-dropping statistics to go with that. For instance, to make the cut to be in the 400 you had to pull in at least $100 million. With an average of $200 million, that means there's people pulling in well over that number. Obviously, quite crazy numbers, and generally speaking not necessarily anything to be concerned about. I'm all for capitalism. But one of the more disheartening statistics was that adjusting for inflation, the minimum income to make the cutoff into the Fortunate 400 has nearly tripled since 1992. That's probably not a good sign as I imagine that...
Post a Comment
Read more