Skip to main content

Integrated Marketing Communications

In my continued efforts to learn about the advertising industry, I read a great textbook called Advertising and Promotion, An Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective. There are far too many topics to summarize here, so I'll cover my main take-aways.

The book covered the integrated marketing planning process and aspects of the promotional mix, including: advertising, direct marketing, interactive and internet marketing, sales promotion, publicity and public relations, and personal selling. The book was well-written, interesting, and included up-to-date anecdotes and stories. It definitely reinforced much of what I learned in brand management and other marketing classes, particularly the marketing planning process. It was a great overview text.

A couple of the things I found most interesting (major take-aways):
  • Companies spend an unbelievable amount on advertising and promotion. If you add it all up, companies spend in excess of $1 trillion. U.S. media expenditures alone exceed $500B (as of 2009 it was $504B).
  • Despite the fragmentation of media, the majority of spending is still done on television (38%) in the U.S. Advertisers still feel that the combination of visual and auditory experience that can be delivered in that medium conveys their message the best. But the internet is fast growing, now having about 9.5% ($48B) in spending. Much of those gains are coming at the expense of newspapers (26%) and magazines (12%) and to a lesser extent radio (7.8%).
  • Targeting has become both easier and more difficult. With the fragmentation of media, there are more avenues for marketers to reach niche segments (e.g. think of all the niche cable TV channels available now compared to the three or four networks available 30 years ago). But, that also makes the job more challenging for marketers. You can target down to specific DMA's via TV, radio, and even the internet (via location). But its the media buyers that have to figure out what to buy where. It requires media buyers to deal with a lot of information. This is where many of the demand-side platforms are coming in like Invite Media (just acquired by Google), Lucid Media (who just raised $4.5M), or Marin Software (just raised $11M).
  • Measurement is incredibly imprecise. Measurement systems like Nielsen or Arbitron leave a lot to be desired and many marketers debate what should be measured in the first place - exposure, recall, recognition, purchase intent, etc. There are a variety of tests that can be done to help refine messages and media selection (e.g. both laboratory and field methods), but measuring efficacy is pretty difficult. How many exposures are necessary? Are you reaching your target audience? Which media work best? Best practice is to measure based on your objectives, use multiple measures, use a consumer response model, and use both pre- and post-tests.
There is a lot of information available on measurement out there worth looking into more. Particularly on the internet and interactive side. Here's a list to follow-up:
  • www.iab.net - Consortium of advertisers and providers outline guidelines and definitions of measurements for interactive media.
  • Sources of measurement data:
  • - Arbitron
  • - MRI and SMRB
  • - Ad analyzer
  • - Audit Bureau of Circulations
  • - Interactive Advertising Bureau
  • - eMarketer
  • - Nielsen Net Ratings
  • - Jupiter Research
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fortunate 400

So there's rich, and then there's super rich. I recently read an article in the WSJ about the top 400 taxpayers based on income. Pretty incredible statistics. Those top 400, or what they call the "Fortunate 400", pulled in $85.6 billion in income in 2005. That's over $200 million each ... in one year! Here's a quick graphic to drive that home: Very impressive. There's all the obvious jaw-dropping statistics to go with that. For instance, to make the cut to be in the 400 you had to pull in at least $100 million. With an average of $200 million, that means there's people pulling in well over that number. Obviously, quite crazy numbers, and generally speaking not necessarily anything to be concerned about. I'm all for capitalism. But one of the more disheartening statistics was that adjusting for inflation, the minimum income to make the cutoff into the Fortunate 400 has nearly tripled since 1992. That's probably not a good sign as I imagine that...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an...
3 comments
Read more

A Possible Solution to the Mortgage Crisis

Came across this one on Mankiw's blog as well (... someone has been stealing my WSJ's each morning before I can pick them up outside). Martin Feldstein, a professor at Harvard and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors for Reagan, had an opinion article in the WSJ yesterday that outlined a possible solution to the mortgage crisis. Criteria for the plan is: don't shift burden to taxpayers, don't force banks to eat all the losses, and create an incentive for homeowners to stay in their homes. The idea is that the US government would provide loans to homeowners up to 20% of their mortgage amount, with a 15 year pay-back period and adjustable interest rate based on the two-year treasury note. The whole thing would be funded by selling more two-year treasury notes. This would obviously not stop anyone from walking away from their home if they have negative equity, but it might prompt those that are worried about that scenario happening to them in the future to sti...
Post a Comment
Read more