Skip to main content

Search Fund Process and Best Practices


From my last post about search funds, I took a closer look at some of the documents on the Stanford CES website.  Specifically, I read through a 2007 study on the state of search funds.  It covered the stages search funds go through and typical characteristics at each stage - profiles of principals, typical fund and acquisition sizes, range of returns for the funds, etc.

Some highlights from the four stages of search funds are as follows:
  1. Raising the search fund (3 months): Write a formal proposal and business plan for the fund.  Sections of the plan include - executive summary, overview of process, list of screening criteria, detailed timeline and milestones, explanation of financing sought, outline of exit alternatives, backgrounds of principals and allocation of future responsibilities in the target.  Raising a fund typically takes around 3 months.
  2. Identifying and making the acquisition (20 months): The three steps in identifying an acquisition are 1) generating deal flow, screening potential candidates, and assessing seller interest.  Typically, principals focus on only a few (2 - 4) target industries and may even further limit their search geographically.  This is a very time-consuming process.  A thoughtful industry screen can take between four and eight months of full-time effort (a lot of effort) and may not turn up a potential acquisition.  Companies are targeted within those industries based on "sustainable market position, their history of positive, stable cash flows, and opportunities for improvement and growth".  This criteria limits the risk associated with investing in principals that have little experience running companies.  Purchase prices range from $5 - $20 million (at around 0.9x annual revenue or 4.9x EBITDA).
  3. Operation (2 - 5 years): Principals run the company for 2 - 5 years focusing on growing the value of the business.  Value creation can happen through multiple ways: revenue growth, improvements in operating efficiency, appropriate use of leverage, or expansion.
  4. Exit: Liquidity events occur in multiple ways, including: sell, take public, investor equity may be sold to other investors or bought back by the company, or dividends may be issued.
Typical search funders are around 30 years old, recent MBA graduates, and ex-management consultants or investment bankers.

I also came across a good best practices document titled "Management Principles for MBA Search Fund/LBO Executives".  It sounded like the biggest risk factor of the business are the people - the old team, the new team, and coaching resources.

Managing Performance of the Old Team: The new CEO has to take control immediately and hold his new employees accountable for their performance.  It's a common mistake for CEO's to let performance issues slide.  This undermines the principal's credibility with employees and jeapordizes the company's ability to perform at the required level.

Getting New Team On-Board Quickly: The new CEO also needs to get their new management team established as soon as possible so that they are running the business (instead of the other way around).

Coaching: The principal should also not feel shy about leveraging the experience of the new board of directors.  Investors expect the new CEO to need support, so it's not a bad idea to have a board member on retainer during the first few months of transition.

Some additional resources to look into further:
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dancing on the Edge of a Volcano

I found this opinion piece ( Democrats aren't innocent bystanders ) interesting on how both Democrats and Republicans share responsibility for polarizing the electorate and undermining some of its faith in democracy. It references two other posts that were pretty good as well: The Disease of Delegitimization The Weimarization of the American Republic The second article is really long and heavy on history.  But given all of the comparisons people make between the current times and those of post-WWI Germany, I found it interesting to dive in to understand where the comparisons are coming from and how close we really are.  The short answer is that we aren't that close (phew). Seems like post-WWI Germany was incredibly fragile.  This was a good excerpt that summarized it: So, unlike the 60s, you have a dynamic in which both sides are behaving like radicals, in which the establishment isn’t yelling “stop,” and in which oikophobia is more evenly distributed, relative to its Boo...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Four Steps to the Epiphany and the Customer Development Model

When I visited FlightCaster over spring break as part of the Duke Week-in-Cities trip, Jason Freedman (founder and CEO) suggested that we all read The Four Steps to the Epiphany by Steve Blank . FlightCaster went through the YCombinator program in 2009 and from what I gathered the book was required reading. I had never even heard of it and it was required reading! I just finished it and I certainly understand why that's the case now. I have to admit the book wasn't necessarily what I expected. It certainly wasn't product management 101. It turned out to be much more about navigating the start-up process rather than specifics about how to design great products. But I can't believe I almost missed out on this one. The book outlines the Customer Development model, a parallel technique to product development that is meant to guide you in the process of iterating and testing each part of your business model until you find one that is repeatable and scalable. The m...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an...
3 comments
Read more