Skip to main content

Search Fund Process and Best Practices


From my last post about search funds, I took a closer look at some of the documents on the Stanford CES website.  Specifically, I read through a 2007 study on the state of search funds.  It covered the stages search funds go through and typical characteristics at each stage - profiles of principals, typical fund and acquisition sizes, range of returns for the funds, etc.

Some highlights from the four stages of search funds are as follows:
  1. Raising the search fund (3 months): Write a formal proposal and business plan for the fund.  Sections of the plan include - executive summary, overview of process, list of screening criteria, detailed timeline and milestones, explanation of financing sought, outline of exit alternatives, backgrounds of principals and allocation of future responsibilities in the target.  Raising a fund typically takes around 3 months.
  2. Identifying and making the acquisition (20 months): The three steps in identifying an acquisition are 1) generating deal flow, screening potential candidates, and assessing seller interest.  Typically, principals focus on only a few (2 - 4) target industries and may even further limit their search geographically.  This is a very time-consuming process.  A thoughtful industry screen can take between four and eight months of full-time effort (a lot of effort) and may not turn up a potential acquisition.  Companies are targeted within those industries based on "sustainable market position, their history of positive, stable cash flows, and opportunities for improvement and growth".  This criteria limits the risk associated with investing in principals that have little experience running companies.  Purchase prices range from $5 - $20 million (at around 0.9x annual revenue or 4.9x EBITDA).
  3. Operation (2 - 5 years): Principals run the company for 2 - 5 years focusing on growing the value of the business.  Value creation can happen through multiple ways: revenue growth, improvements in operating efficiency, appropriate use of leverage, or expansion.
  4. Exit: Liquidity events occur in multiple ways, including: sell, take public, investor equity may be sold to other investors or bought back by the company, or dividends may be issued.
Typical search funders are around 30 years old, recent MBA graduates, and ex-management consultants or investment bankers.

I also came across a good best practices document titled "Management Principles for MBA Search Fund/LBO Executives".  It sounded like the biggest risk factor of the business are the people - the old team, the new team, and coaching resources.

Managing Performance of the Old Team: The new CEO has to take control immediately and hold his new employees accountable for their performance.  It's a common mistake for CEO's to let performance issues slide.  This undermines the principal's credibility with employees and jeapordizes the company's ability to perform at the required level.

Getting New Team On-Board Quickly: The new CEO also needs to get their new management team established as soon as possible so that they are running the business (instead of the other way around).

Coaching: The principal should also not feel shy about leveraging the experience of the new board of directors.  Investors expect the new CEO to need support, so it's not a bad idea to have a board member on retainer during the first few months of transition.

Some additional resources to look into further:
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biofuels May Hinder Anitglobal-Warming Efforts

Read an interesting article a couple weeks back in the WSJ on how biofuels may actually increase carbon emissions in the medium to long-term. Apprently the shifts in land-use necessary to support the production of bio-materials like soybeans, corn, or palm could in fact release more carbon emissions. The time it takes to get carbon-neutral on some of these projects is pretty crazy - 319 years for soybean biodiesel from Brazil (assuming you're clearing rainforest), 93 years for corn ethanol from the U.S. (assuming you're clearing grasslands), 86 years for palm biodiesel from Indonesia (assuming you're clearing rainforest). I suppose biofuels really aren't meant to reduce carbon emissions, but just crazy that they potentially exacerbate the problem so much.
3 comments
Read more

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an
3 comments
Read more

Bloomberg for President?

We can only hope. I read an article in the WSJ about how business people across the country, from entrepreneurs to bankers, are all hoping for Bloomberg to run. The economy thus far seems to have taken an unusual backseat in this years election but seems to be emerging as an important issue. An interesting excerpt: As the economy has emerged as a dominant issue in the 2008 campaign, candidates have struck populist notes, from Republican Mike Huckabee's boast that he is not a "wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street" to Democrat Barack Obama's visit to Wall Street to chastise finance executives for failing to protect the middle class. I can see the approach these guys are taking and I'm sure they have really smart campaign strategists. But I really wonder if this type of message of polarizing the "working man" vs. "big business" really resonates with voters anymore? Is the middle-class really that disgruntled with big business and income dispa
2 comments
Read more