What's Wrong with Cleantech VC

I came across this post on GreenVC.org from Rob Day an investment principal at @Ventures about what's wrong with cleantech venture capital right now. The presentation is included below, but Day summarizes the trends he sees as follows:

The shift to larger and larger funds.
The related shift to later-stage investing.
The related shift into capital-intensive subsectors and business models within cleantech.
The mismatch of investment concentration with the geographic dispersion of cleantech innovations and innovators.
The concentration of venture capital investments into just a few subsectors, while the lion’s share of subsectors receive much less attention (much less dollars) from investors.

From flipping through the presentation itself, a few other things stuck out to me (in my own terms):

VC's don't know what businesses will work and which don't work (i.e. provide a good return). There just haven't been enough exits yet.
Exit have been trending towards M&A's rather than IPO's. This is the case across the board in VC.
Although cleantech has many different segments (e.g. transportation, water, energy storage, etc.) across many different markets (e.g. personal, residential, industrial, government, etc.), yet VC's have been putting all their money into only a few subsectors.

I also came across an interview with Steve Jurvetson from Draper Fisher Jurvetson about DFJ's focus on cleantech these days. Jurvetson seems to agree that certain areas are over-funded right now, like some biofuels for example. He also agrees to stay away from investments that are overly capital intensive. Day was arguing that venture firms should focus on finding investments that fit the existing VC model rather than redefining the VC model to fit with the higher capital requirements of some cleantech ventures.

What's Wrong With Cleantech VC

View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: greentech alternative)

Comments

Dancing on the Edge of a Volcano

I found this opinion piece ( Democrats aren't innocent bystanders ) interesting on how both Democrats and Republicans share responsibility for polarizing the electorate and undermining some of its faith in democracy. It references two other posts that were pretty good as well: The Disease of Delegitimization The Weimarization of the American Republic The second article is really long and heavy on history. But given all of the comparisons people make between the current times and those of post-WWI Germany, I found it interesting to dive in to understand where the comparisons are coming from and how close we really are. The short answer is that we aren't that close (phew). Seems like post-WWI Germany was incredibly fragile. This was a good excerpt that summarized it: So, unlike the 60s, you have a dynamic in which both sides are behaving like radicals, in which the establishment isn’t yelling “stop,” and in which oikophobia is more evenly distributed, relative to its Boo...

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an...

The Four Steps to the Epiphany and the Customer Development Model

When I visited FlightCaster over spring break as part of the Duke Week-in-Cities trip, Jason Freedman (founder and CEO) suggested that we all read The Four Steps to the Epiphany by Steve Blank . FlightCaster went through the YCombinator program in 2009 and from what I gathered the book was required reading. I had never even heard of it and it was required reading! I just finished it and I certainly understand why that's the case now. I have to admit the book wasn't necessarily what I expected. It certainly wasn't product management 101. It turned out to be much more about navigating the start-up process rather than specifics about how to design great products. But I can't believe I almost missed out on this one. The book outlines the Customer Development model, a parallel technique to product development that is meant to guide you in the process of iterating and testing each part of your business model until you find one that is repeatable and scalable. The m...

Power Pal

Search This Blog