Apparel and Retail in China, India, and Brazil

I've never been to China, India, or Brazil, so it's really interesting to read how different retailing works there. I had a previous post on the subject about how chaos sells in India. I recently read an article in the McKinsey Quarterly on the subject.

A couple interesting highlights:

China: The average Chinese person doesn't really distinguish clothing for different occasions or uses. Work, weddings, special events, etc. all generally fall into the same category for them. And they don't view foreign brands as at all superior to domestic brands. That's the average Chinese person of course. The youth in China are much more similar to those in the U.S. They view foreign brands more favorably and are willing to spend more on clothing as their incomes rise. Lesson here is to focus on the youth.

India: For Indians, apparently shopping is a family affair. Indians (across all regions, income segments, and age ranges) believe that shopping is a family activity. In fact, 70% always go to stores with family and 74% view shopping as the best way to spend time with their family. And then in terms of clothing segments, Indians spend most of their money on clothing for special events like weddings and festivals. And then in terms of decision making, apparently Indian men generally decide which stores the family shops in but Indian women decide which clothes to buy. Lesson here is family friendly, focused on special events, stores need to appeal to men, but clothes need to appeal to women.

Brazil: The really notable thing about Brazil's retail market is the availability and use of credit. Brazil really doesn't have a credit-reporting system; they track defaults on debt (at the bank level) but not positive credit worthiness. Because of that lack of information, there are no general use credit cards. Instead, multinational retailers provide private-label credit cards with low initial spending limits. As consumers prove their credit-worthiness, they earn bigger spending limits. Lesson here is that if you're going to expand to Brazil, you need a team that can build out the credit side for you.

Comments

Biofuels May Hinder Anitglobal-Warming Efforts

Read an interesting article a couple weeks back in the WSJ on how biofuels may actually increase carbon emissions in the medium to long-term. Apprently the shifts in land-use necessary to support the production of bio-materials like soybeans, corn, or palm could in fact release more carbon emissions. The time it takes to get carbon-neutral on some of these projects is pretty crazy - 319 years for soybean biodiesel from Brazil (assuming you're clearing rainforest), 93 years for corn ethanol from the U.S. (assuming you're clearing grasslands), 86 years for palm biodiesel from Indonesia (assuming you're clearing rainforest). I suppose biofuels really aren't meant to reduce carbon emissions, but just crazy that they potentially exacerbate the problem so much.

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an

Bloomberg for President?

We can only hope. I read an article in the WSJ about how business people across the country, from entrepreneurs to bankers, are all hoping for Bloomberg to run. The economy thus far seems to have taken an unusual backseat in this years election but seems to be emerging as an important issue. An interesting excerpt: As the economy has emerged as a dominant issue in the 2008 campaign, candidates have struck populist notes, from Republican Mike Huckabee's boast that he is not a "wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street" to Democrat Barack Obama's visit to Wall Street to chastise finance executives for failing to protect the middle class. I can see the approach these guys are taking and I'm sure they have really smart campaign strategists. But I really wonder if this type of message of polarizing the "working man" vs. "big business" really resonates with voters anymore? Is the middle-class really that disgruntled with big business and income dispa

Power Pal

Search This Blog