Skip to main content

Apparel and Retail in China, India, and Brazil

I've never been to China, India, or Brazil, so it's really interesting to read how different retailing works there. I had a previous post on the subject about how chaos sells in India. I recently read an article in the McKinsey Quarterly on the subject.

A couple interesting highlights:


  • China: The average Chinese person doesn't really distinguish clothing for different occasions or uses. Work, weddings, special events, etc. all generally fall into the same category for them. And they don't view foreign brands as at all superior to domestic brands. That's the average Chinese person of course. The youth in China are much more similar to those in the U.S. They view foreign brands more favorably and are willing to spend more on clothing as their incomes rise. Lesson here is to focus on the youth.

  • India: For Indians, apparently shopping is a family affair. Indians (across all regions, income segments, and age ranges) believe that shopping is a family activity. In fact, 70% always go to stores with family and 74% view shopping as the best way to spend time with their family. And then in terms of clothing segments, Indians spend most of their money on clothing for special events like weddings and festivals. And then in terms of decision making, apparently Indian men generally decide which stores the family shops in but Indian women decide which clothes to buy. Lesson here is family friendly, focused on special events, stores need to appeal to men, but clothes need to appeal to women.

  • Brazil: The really notable thing about Brazil's retail market is the availability and use of credit. Brazil really doesn't have a credit-reporting system; they track defaults on debt (at the bank level) but not positive credit worthiness. Because of that lack of information, there are no general use credit cards. Instead, multinational retailers provide private-label credit cards with low initial spending limits. As consumers prove their credit-worthiness, they earn bigger spending limits. Lesson here is that if you're going to expand to Brazil, you need a team that can build out the credit side for you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Possible Solution to the Mortgage Crisis

Came across this one on Mankiw's blog as well (... someone has been stealing my WSJ's each morning before I can pick them up outside). Martin Feldstein, a professor at Harvard and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors for Reagan, had an opinion article in the WSJ yesterday that outlined a possible solution to the mortgage crisis. Criteria for the plan is: don't shift burden to taxpayers, don't force banks to eat all the losses, and create an incentive for homeowners to stay in their homes. The idea is that the US government would provide loans to homeowners up to 20% of their mortgage amount, with a 15 year pay-back period and adjustable interest rate based on the two-year treasury note. The whole thing would be funded by selling more two-year treasury notes. This would obviously not stop anyone from walking away from their home if they have negative equity, but it might prompt those that are worried about that scenario happening to them in the future to sti...

The Reluctant Fundamentalist

I read The Reluctant Fundamentalist by Mohsin Hamid while on vacation in Italy and thought it was really good. The book basically tells the story of a Pakistani man who comes to the US, attends a good university, gets a dream job in financial services in New York, falls in love with an American girl, and then abandons it all to return to his home country after 9/11. Although the story is a little contrived - the parallel between the man's failing romance with the girl and his failing romance with America is a little too obvious - it's really wonderfully written and a real page-turner. Given my ethnic background, how I went to a good school, moved to New York to do consulting, and was there on 9/11, much of the story felt familiar. At its core, for me, it was really a story about identity in the U.S. Particularly about changing your identity here - the ability to transform from an immigrant or an outsider to one of the elite and how America post-9/11 developed an isolationi...

The Fortunate 400

So there's rich, and then there's super rich. I recently read an article in the WSJ about the top 400 taxpayers based on income. Pretty incredible statistics. Those top 400, or what they call the "Fortunate 400", pulled in $85.6 billion in income in 2005. That's over $200 million each ... in one year! Here's a quick graphic to drive that home: Very impressive. There's all the obvious jaw-dropping statistics to go with that. For instance, to make the cut to be in the 400 you had to pull in at least $100 million. With an average of $200 million, that means there's people pulling in well over that number. Obviously, quite crazy numbers, and generally speaking not necessarily anything to be concerned about. I'm all for capitalism. But one of the more disheartening statistics was that adjusting for inflation, the minimum income to make the cutoff into the Fortunate 400 has nearly tripled since 1992. That's probably not a good sign as I imagine that...