Skip to main content

Illegal Holiday Sales?

The holidays have passed and the madness associated with holiday sales has as well. But what's so common in the United States is actually quite uncommon around the world, particularly in Europe. I read an article in the WSJ last Christmas Eve about how German stores are finally offering items on sale during the holiday season. Up until 2004, that practice was actually illegal! The stores are finally loosening up, extending store hours and offering significant discounts.

It's interesting why those laws existed in the first place. The simple answer is that it's a general controlled economy system that has existed in Europe for some time. Trade unions, churches, and small retailers all have traditionally argued that increased flexibility hurts store workers and benefits only the larger retailers. And then a more unusual reason was also included in the article:

In Germany, it took years of intense debate to eliminate a Nazi-era law that prohibited haggling and put limits on bonus schemes such as store-loyalty cards. Enacted in 1933 after the economic instability following World War I, the so-called Discount Law and another regulation passed at the time, the Free Gift Act banning giveaways except for trinkets, were seen as a way to protect the distribution of goods to consumers, and to protect consumers from the vagaries of the free market. For the Nazis, it was also a way to hurt the country's department-store owners -- many of them Jewish -- who had been experimenting with creative sales strategies.

The Discount Law lived on beyond the war years because many consumers saw a need to protect small shopkeepers from large retail chains. Some thought that consumers, too, needed protection. It wasn't until this set of laws was scrapped in 2001 that retailers could offer deals like gifts with purchases and discounts for volume buys.

"Germans tend to adhere to structures and rhythms that don't change," says Rolf Pangels, managing director of the retail federation BaG in Berlin. "And they tend to want a law for everything. An American wouldn't understand all the laws we have
here."


I'm sure a lot of traditions will have to change in the coming years.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fortunate 400

So there's rich, and then there's super rich. I recently read an article in the WSJ about the top 400 taxpayers based on income. Pretty incredible statistics. Those top 400, or what they call the "Fortunate 400", pulled in $85.6 billion in income in 2005. That's over $200 million each ... in one year! Here's a quick graphic to drive that home: Very impressive. There's all the obvious jaw-dropping statistics to go with that. For instance, to make the cut to be in the 400 you had to pull in at least $100 million. With an average of $200 million, that means there's people pulling in well over that number. Obviously, quite crazy numbers, and generally speaking not necessarily anything to be concerned about. I'm all for capitalism. But one of the more disheartening statistics was that adjusting for inflation, the minimum income to make the cutoff into the Fortunate 400 has nearly tripled since 1992. That's probably not a good sign as I imagine that...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an...
3 comments
Read more

A Possible Solution to the Mortgage Crisis

Came across this one on Mankiw's blog as well (... someone has been stealing my WSJ's each morning before I can pick them up outside). Martin Feldstein, a professor at Harvard and chairman of the Council of Economic Advisors for Reagan, had an opinion article in the WSJ yesterday that outlined a possible solution to the mortgage crisis. Criteria for the plan is: don't shift burden to taxpayers, don't force banks to eat all the losses, and create an incentive for homeowners to stay in their homes. The idea is that the US government would provide loans to homeowners up to 20% of their mortgage amount, with a 15 year pay-back period and adjustable interest rate based on the two-year treasury note. The whole thing would be funded by selling more two-year treasury notes. This would obviously not stop anyone from walking away from their home if they have negative equity, but it might prompt those that are worried about that scenario happening to them in the future to sti...
Post a Comment
Read more