Illegal Holiday Sales?

The holidays have passed and the madness associated with holiday sales has as well. But what's so common in the United States is actually quite uncommon around the world, particularly in Europe. I read an article in the WSJ last Christmas Eve about how German stores are finally offering items on sale during the holiday season. Up until 2004, that practice was actually illegal! The stores are finally loosening up, extending store hours and offering significant discounts.

It's interesting why those laws existed in the first place. The simple answer is that it's a general controlled economy system that has existed in Europe for some time. Trade unions, churches, and small retailers all have traditionally argued that increased flexibility hurts store workers and benefits only the larger retailers. And then a more unusual reason was also included in the article:

In Germany, it took years of intense debate to eliminate a Nazi-era law that prohibited haggling and put limits on bonus schemes such as store-loyalty cards. Enacted in 1933 after the economic instability following World War I, the so-called Discount Law and another regulation passed at the time, the Free Gift Act banning giveaways except for trinkets, were seen as a way to protect the distribution of goods to consumers, and to protect consumers from the vagaries of the free market. For the Nazis, it was also a way to hurt the country's department-store owners -- many of them Jewish -- who had been experimenting with creative sales strategies.

The Discount Law lived on beyond the war years because many consumers saw a need to protect small shopkeepers from large retail chains. Some thought that consumers, too, needed protection. It wasn't until this set of laws was scrapped in 2001 that retailers could offer deals like gifts with purchases and discounts for volume buys.

"Germans tend to adhere to structures and rhythms that don't change," says Rolf Pangels, managing director of the retail federation BaG in Berlin. "And they tend to want a law for everything. An American wouldn't understand all the laws we have
here."


I'm sure a lot of traditions will have to change in the coming years.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Green VC Stars

Image
There's a lot of VC money going into "green tech" projects these days - $2.2 billion in 2007! I read an article in Forbes about the next generation of VC's leading the charge. The bios of these folks is truly ridiculous. Here's an excerpt: This trio could get hired anywhere. Aileen Lee was president of her section at Harvard Business School. Trae Vassallo learned to program when she was 7 and at 28 cofounded a wireless e-mail company that Motorola bought for $550 million. Samir Kaul led the effort to sequence the genome of the arabidopsis plant and then built three life sciences companies from scratch. He's only 33. These three are among venture capital's new guard. That's kind of humbling.
Read more

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

Image
I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an...
Read more

Dancing on the Edge of a Volcano

I found this opinion piece ( Democrats aren't innocent bystanders ) interesting on how both Democrats and Republicans share responsibility for polarizing the electorate and undermining some of its faith in democracy. It references two other posts that were pretty good as well: The Disease of Delegitimization The Weimarization of the American Republic The second article is really long and heavy on history.  But given all of the comparisons people make between the current times and those of post-WWI Germany, I found it interesting to dive in to understand where the comparisons are coming from and how close we really are.  The short answer is that we aren't that close (phew). Seems like post-WWI Germany was incredibly fragile.  This was a good excerpt that summarized it: So, unlike the 60s, you have a dynamic in which both sides are behaving like radicals, in which the establishment isn’t yelling “stop,” and in which oikophobia is more evenly distributed, relative to its Boo...
Read more