Skip to main content

The Resource Curse

I read a really interesting article in Knowledge@Wharton about what is called "The Resource Curse". It's an economic paradox in which countries that have substantial natural resource reserves, particularly in petroleum and natural gas, are actually worse off as a result compared to countries that do not have those reserves. The article primarily focuses on African nations that are major oil exporters or where recent oil reserves have been discovered. The cause of the paradox seems to be several fold (these are my conclusions from the article):
  • Over-valued currency leads to decrease in exports - The export of oil greatly inflates the value of the country's currency, causing any other exported item to be uncompetitive in the global marketplace. Agriculture, manufacturing, or most other industries are at a severe disadvantage compared to neighboring countries. This has a substantial impact on the average, every-day African citizen.

  • Single industry economy leads to atrophy of traditional industries - Because of the booming petroleum business, workers flock to that industry leaving all other industries short on labor. Traditional industries like agriculture are decimated. Combined with over-valued currency, you end up with a single-industry economy where you import everything but energy resources. In the short-run this might seem ok, but all of these oil reserves will eventually run dry at some point. At that time, all of the other industries in the country will have atrophied, leaving the country with few industries to fall back on.

  • Corruption leads to lack of internal investment - Oil companies are more than happy to pay their fair share of taxes and kick-backs. Politicians end up vying for these dollars instead of worrying about their constituencies. With a government essentially funded by the oil companies and not funded by income taxes from the general population, the politicians have little incentive to serve their constituents in the short or long-term. In addition, at the time when oil reserves are discovered in most of these countries, their social and political systems are extremely immature. They don't yet have the checks and balances in place to understand how to deal with opportunity. Instead of providing a nudge to mature quicker, infusing huge amounts of cash into the economy likely hinders maturity because there is, again, little incentive for politicians or citizens to do worry about structural improvements in systems like education or infrastructure.

It's a pretty fascinating paradox when you think about. But I'm sure it's not one without parallels in other areas. For instance, politically, can you take Iraq, a country that has been ruled by a dictator for two or three decades, and within the course of several years turn it into a democracy? And then economically, can you take Russia, a country that has for decades relied on a command or centrally controlled economy, and expect it to change and sustain an open-market economy? (Is it that surprising that they are bringing several industries back under state control?) I think generally speaking there's a lesson here about globalization and the pace of change that economies can really capitalize on. If the basic systems are not in place to balance out an economy and sustain opportunity, any benefits from political reform, economic reform, or new investment will be fleeting.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biofuels May Hinder Anitglobal-Warming Efforts

Read an interesting article a couple weeks back in the WSJ on how biofuels may actually increase carbon emissions in the medium to long-term. Apprently the shifts in land-use necessary to support the production of bio-materials like soybeans, corn, or palm could in fact release more carbon emissions. The time it takes to get carbon-neutral on some of these projects is pretty crazy - 319 years for soybean biodiesel from Brazil (assuming you're clearing rainforest), 93 years for corn ethanol from the U.S. (assuming you're clearing grasslands), 86 years for palm biodiesel from Indonesia (assuming you're clearing rainforest). I suppose biofuels really aren't meant to reduce carbon emissions, but just crazy that they potentially exacerbate the problem so much.
3 comments
Read more

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an
3 comments
Read more

Bloomberg for President?

We can only hope. I read an article in the WSJ about how business people across the country, from entrepreneurs to bankers, are all hoping for Bloomberg to run. The economy thus far seems to have taken an unusual backseat in this years election but seems to be emerging as an important issue. An interesting excerpt: As the economy has emerged as a dominant issue in the 2008 campaign, candidates have struck populist notes, from Republican Mike Huckabee's boast that he is not a "wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street" to Democrat Barack Obama's visit to Wall Street to chastise finance executives for failing to protect the middle class. I can see the approach these guys are taking and I'm sure they have really smart campaign strategists. But I really wonder if this type of message of polarizing the "working man" vs. "big business" really resonates with voters anymore? Is the middle-class really that disgruntled with big business and income dispa
2 comments
Read more