Japan Needs More Babies

Just read an article in the WSJ about how Japan may consider an increase in its consumption tax from its current level of 5%. The reason - they need the revenue to cope with the aging population in Japan. It's a similar issue to that of social security in the United States. As the population ages and there are not as many children born (as a percentage of the population), there are fewer and fewer wage earners to contribute to social security payments. As a result, payments or taxes must be higher. Birth rates are a key economic measure to monitor when looking at the long-term challenges of supporting the aging population. To put in perspective how dire Japan's situation is, they are ranked second to last in terms of birth rate - at 8.1 births per 1000 population. Germany's in a pretty bad situation as well with 8.2 births / 1000 population. Some benchmarks from the CIA World Factbook:

#1 - Niger - 50.16 births / 1000 population

#119 - Israel - 17.71 births / 1000 population

#152 - United States - 14.16 births / 1000 population

#159 - China - 13.45 births / 1000 population

#185 - United Kingdom - 10.67 births / 1000 population

#221 - Germany - 8.2 births / 1000 population

#222 - Japan - 8.1 births / 1000 population

It's obviously important to consider the mortality rate as well, but most developed countries are generally close on that measure. Japan's and Germany's economies are going to face an incredible challenge in the coming years.

Comments

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an...

Dancing on the Edge of a Volcano

I found this opinion piece ( Democrats aren't innocent bystanders ) interesting on how both Democrats and Republicans share responsibility for polarizing the electorate and undermining some of its faith in democracy. It references two other posts that were pretty good as well: The Disease of Delegitimization The Weimarization of the American Republic The second article is really long and heavy on history. But given all of the comparisons people make between the current times and those of post-WWI Germany, I found it interesting to dive in to understand where the comparisons are coming from and how close we really are. The short answer is that we aren't that close (phew). Seems like post-WWI Germany was incredibly fragile. This was a good excerpt that summarized it: So, unlike the 60s, you have a dynamic in which both sides are behaving like radicals, in which the establishment isn’t yelling “stop,” and in which oikophobia is more evenly distributed, relative to its Boo...

The Fortunate 400

So there's rich, and then there's super rich. I recently read an article in the WSJ about the top 400 taxpayers based on income. Pretty incredible statistics. Those top 400, or what they call the "Fortunate 400", pulled in $85.6 billion in income in 2005. That's over $200 million each ... in one year! Here's a quick graphic to drive that home: Very impressive. There's all the obvious jaw-dropping statistics to go with that. For instance, to make the cut to be in the 400 you had to pull in at least $100 million. With an average of $200 million, that means there's people pulling in well over that number. Obviously, quite crazy numbers, and generally speaking not necessarily anything to be concerned about. I'm all for capitalism. But one of the more disheartening statistics was that adjusting for inflation, the minimum income to make the cutoff into the Fortunate 400 has nearly tripled since 1992. That's probably not a good sign as I imagine that...

Power Pal

Search This Blog