Skip to main content

Bloomberg for President?

We can only hope. I read an article in the WSJ about how business people across the country, from entrepreneurs to bankers, are all hoping for Bloomberg to run. The economy thus far seems to have taken an unusual backseat in this years election but seems to be emerging as an important issue. An interesting excerpt:

As the economy has emerged as a dominant issue in the 2008 campaign, candidates have struck populist notes, from Republican Mike Huckabee's boast that he is not a "wholly owned subsidiary of Wall Street" to Democrat Barack Obama's visit to Wall Street to chastise finance executives for failing to protect the middle class.
I can see the approach these guys are taking and I'm sure they have really smart campaign strategists. But I really wonder if this type of message of polarizing the "working man" vs. "big business" really resonates with voters anymore? Is the middle-class really that disgruntled with big business and income disparity? Does the average American believe in a zero-sum game and that wealth creation can only happen for them if it shifts down from the upper class? The data just doesn't reflect the reality of that (see my previous posts - Moving on Up and The Poor Get Richer) and I would venture that most Americans feel that way as well.


As an aside, Kamal Nath, the Cabinet Minister for the Ministry of Commerce and Industry in India, recently published a book (while still in office ... which is unusual) called India's Century. It's basically about the rise of India in the 20th century and how Asian economies will soon take over as the leaders in the world. That's a profound campaign topic right there. I don't see how pitting the middle class against business helps to address that challenge.
Labels:

Comments

gnp said…
Do you think any of the candidates would have Bloomberg as their VP?
January 21, 2008 at 9:21 AM
Steven Pal said…
He doesn't seem to be interested in the VP spot and he's an independent anyway. So doubtful. I seriously hope he joins the campaign after the primaries in February. Giuliani, McCain, or Clinton are as close to who I'd vote for from the main parties. But I'd have to do so with major reservations.
January 21, 2008 at 1:48 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Nine Prescriptions for Building the Duke Entrepreneurial Community

I think Duke can have one of the strongest entrepreneurial communities in the world. Are we there yet? Well, not yet. But there's a tremendous amount of momentum that I saw build in just the past two years while I was getting my MBA at Duke. While leading Duke's 10th annual business plan competition, the Duke Start-Up Challenge (DSC) , last year, I witnessed a near doubling of participation on campus in just a single year. The interest on the ground was clearly there and building rapidly. But now that I'm an alum, I'm looking back and wondering ... how do we rev-up the Duke entrepreneurial community even more? I read a great article by Daniel Isenberg, a professor of management at Babson, called " How to Start an Entrepreneurial Revolution " in the June edition of the Harvard Business Review. Isenberg outlines nine prescriptions for governments that want to create entrepreneurship ecosystems in their countries. Although he was focused on governments an
3 comments
Read more

Biofuels May Hinder Anitglobal-Warming Efforts

Read an interesting article a couple weeks back in the WSJ on how biofuels may actually increase carbon emissions in the medium to long-term. Apprently the shifts in land-use necessary to support the production of bio-materials like soybeans, corn, or palm could in fact release more carbon emissions. The time it takes to get carbon-neutral on some of these projects is pretty crazy - 319 years for soybean biodiesel from Brazil (assuming you're clearing rainforest), 93 years for corn ethanol from the U.S. (assuming you're clearing grasslands), 86 years for palm biodiesel from Indonesia (assuming you're clearing rainforest). I suppose biofuels really aren't meant to reduce carbon emissions, but just crazy that they potentially exacerbate the problem so much.
3 comments
Read more